Established 1826 — Oldest College Newspaper West of the Alleghenies

We are one faculty. We share a community of interest.

Can a single collective bargaining unit represent different faculty ranks and categories? Do tenure-line faculty, visiting faculty, Teaching, Clinical Professors and Lecturers (TCPL) and librarians want to be in a single bargaining unit? Are we all one faculty? 

Yes, yes and yes! 

In sworn testimony at a state hearing in December, 13 witnesses from the Faculty Alliance of Miami (FAM) (representing TCPL, librarian, tenured, pre-tenure and visiting faculty) detailed the facts of their employment, making a clear case that all faculty share in the work — teaching, research and service — of Miami’s educational mission. That is, we constitute a legal “community of interest” appropriate for a bargaining unit. A single bargaining unit that includes all faculty — like most collective bargaining units at Ohio universities — is what Miami faculty want, need and deserve.

By contrast, Miami’s four witnesses — all executive administrators — claimed that faculty hired at different ranks do such different work that we cannot constitute a community of interest. Administrators also offered their opinions (without evidence) that faculty in different categories would not have each other’s backs at the bargaining table. They argued that precarious faculty would be better represented by administrators than by uniting with their colleagues. 

In fact, FAM is supported by a supermajority of faculty precisely because of the failure of Miami administrators to adequately represent our interests. And, as FAM witnesses argued, while all faculty benefit from unionization, it’s precarious faculty who are most in need of the protection of a union and negotiated contract. Administrative witnesses made this crystal clear, claiming that non-tenure-line faculty do not have academic freedom (though Miami’s Policy Library says they do) and highlighting the lack of protections for TCPL faculty should they be nonrenewed or fired.

Administrative witnesses also alleged that a single bargaining unit would be “inefficient.” But multiple negotiations would surely be a nightmare of inefficiency. A single collective bargaining agreement can accommodate the needs of different categories of faculty — and already does so at many universities in Ohio.

Miami’s administration, in an effort to delay a union vote, is attempting to divide faculty. But it is actually the administration that hires people into different levels of precarity. And it is the administration that has made choices harmful to our educational mission. As we saw in 2020, when the administration let go of hundreds of visiting faculty, over 800 of us signed a petition asking them to discuss other options. We had those colleagues’ backs. We had their backs then, and we will have their backs at the bargaining table. 

Under Ohio code, the first factor in determining a community of interest that justifies a bargaining unit is “the desires of the employees.” FAM submitted cards to the state in June 2022 demonstrating that a majority of employees want the chance to form a bargaining unit. Miami has had the opportunity to Let Us Vote. Instead, they have delayed, dragged their feet and attempted to divide us. 

Faculty do not want to be divided against our own interests. That’s why we continue to build a union by listening to one another — because solidarity is the source of our power. 


Julie Alexander, First-Year Integrated Core, FSB

Phill Alexander, Emerging Technology in Business and Design, CCA

Enjoy what you're reading?
Signup for our newsletter

Ann Elizabeth Armstrong, Department of Theatre, CCA

Ginny Boehme, University Libraries

Michelle D. Boone, Department of Biology, CAS

Mary Jean Corbett, Department of English, CAS

Linh Dich, Departments of English and Languages, Literatures, and Writing, CLAAS

Todd Dupont, Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, CAS

Todd Edwards, Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry, EHS 

Daniel Gladish, Departments of Biology and Biological Sciences, CLAAS

Ryan Gunderson, Department of Sociology and Gerontology, CAS

Mack Hagood, Department of Media, Journalism & Film, CAS

Kazue Harada, Department of German, Russian, Asian and Middle Eastern Languages and Cultures, CAS

Theresa Kulbaga, Departments of English and Languages, Literatures, and Writing, CLAAS

Rachel Makarowski, University Libraries 

Shashi Lalvani, Department of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, CEC

Paul Larson, Department of Mathematics, CAS

Eric Luczaj, Department of Computer and Information Technology, CLAAS

Deborah Lyons, Department of French, Italian, & Classical Studies, CAS

Richard Moore, Department of Biology, CAS

Zafer Ozdemir, Department of Information Systems & Analytics, FSB

Jason Palmeri, Department of English, CAS

Daniel Prior, Department of History, CAS

Kevin Reuning, Department of Political Science, CAS

Ann Rypstra, Department of Biology, CAS

John Schaefer, Departments of Anthropology and Social and Behavioral Sciences, CLAAS

Paul Schaeffer, Department of Biology, CASMatthew Smith, Department of Humanities and Creative Arts, CLAAS

Nancy Solomon, Department of Biology, CAS

Hank Stevens, Department of Biology, CAS

Heeyoung Tai, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, CASMike Vanni, Department of Biology, CAS

Cathy Wagner, Department of English, CAS

Anne Whitesell, Department of Political Science, CAS

Amy Yousefi, Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, CEC