Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Opinion | Looking back at 1999 war in Kosovo: Why is the world waiting to help Syrians?

Nicole's Two Cents

Editorial Editor

Published: Friday, September 6, 2013

Updated: Friday, September 6, 2013 14:09

This summer, I woke almost every morning at 5 a.m. to go running before anyone else in Kosovo was awake. I laced up my shoes, walked out of my hotel in Prishtina, the capital of about 200,000 people, and ran the streets that would soon be busy with Kosovars going to work, street vendors haggling with customers and taxis dodging in and out of traffic. Prishtina is slowly on its way to becoming a modern city, filled with well-dressed young professionals and families looking towards a better future.

It was easy to forget that just 13 years ago innocent people were being murdered and tortured in these same streets I was quietly running on. During the 1999 war with Serbia, an estimated 7,000 to 9,000 Kosovar Albanians were killed and more than 800,000 ethnically cleansed from their homes, forced to leave maybe the only place they have ever known. Ghosts from the conflict still haunted the city — it was evident.

Running before the city was awake allowed me to see a different side of Kosovo apart from the business of it and the 24-hour nightlife.

I saw the pain in the dilapidated, burned-out buildings, I passed countless amount of graffiti condemning European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX) for sympathizing with Serbians, I saw the Serbian language crossed out completely on road signs, even though it is one of the national languages.

The feelings and pain are still intertwined in Kosovo’s every day life and politics; you just need to take a look closer in the quiet scars slashed across Kosovo’s infrastructure and its people.

Syria began to erupt as I ran through Prishtina and worked there this summer, and I couldn’t help but be bothered by it. I started to think about what happened to Kosovars, Bosnians, Croats and other ethnicities during the '90s and what is now happening to Syrians.

The UN has estimated that already 100,000 plus have been killed in Syria and now there is potential evidence of chemical weapons being used on Syrians by Bashar al-Assad and his regime. Videos on YouTube have been posted by rebel groups of bodies of children and women lying dead with no signs of blunt trauma to them, their faces tinted blue, bodies convulsing — possible signs of suffocation from chemicals.

As the United States and other Western powers struggle with what to do with Syria, more people are being killed. Most of the targets are rebel Sunnis, which is one of the largest branches of Islam. Ethnic cleansing, genocide, whatever term you want to coin this violence as, it is continuous in the country of 20.8 million. It took chemical warfare to get the United States truly invested in trying to find a solution, but how much longer will it take to help the Syrian people?

Situation rings a slightly familiar bell – doesn’t it?

Let’s back track to almost 20 years ago and instead trace our fingers along a map of Southeastern Europe, or the former Yugoslavia. Instead of villain Bashar al-Assad slaying innocent men, women and children and a targeted religious group in Syria, there was Slobodan Milosevic, President of Serbia and President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1997 to 2000.

He invaded Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo during the 1990s and tried to ethnically cleanse and murder an entire ethnic group — Albanians.

Where 100,000 Syrians are now dead, over 8,000 Bosniaks were tortured and murdered during the 1992 massacre of Srebrenica in Bosnia and the Siege of Sarajevo by the Army of Republic of Serbia. Srebrenica has been regarded as the worst case of genocide since the Holocaust in World War II — take a look at American journalist Ron Haviv’s images and work of the war in Bosnia and Srebrenica, you will then only get a slight understanding of the devastation that occurred and a possible stomach ache from the violence he captured, risking his life to do so.

The devastation in Bosnia with Srebrenica left a strong stench of guilt under Western leaders’ noses, like Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, who vowed not to let genocide happen again in Kosovo, now a small country of only 2.8 million, by Serbian forces. Tim Judah, correspondent for the Economist and author of “Kosovo What Everyone Needs to Know” sums up why the U.S. and NATO were ready to bomb Serbia after Srebrenica.

“This was a seminal event and its importance in changing the course of history in Kosovo is not widely understood. The fact this massacre had happened in a zone that the UN Security Council had pledged to protect was seared into the consciences of Western leaders and goes a long way to explaining why in 1999, they were prepared to move fast to bomb Serbia because of Kosovo, fearful that such a thing would happen again.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Be the first to comment on this article! Log in to Comment

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In